Dansk - English
Short version - Full version
Network Security (Fall 2003) |
|||
| Course code : | ENETS-U01 | ||
| ECTS Credits : | 7,5 | Status : | Optional for specified Programme |
| Revised : | 31/10 2003 | Written : | 19/03 2003 |
| Placement : | 6. semester | Hours per week : | 4 |
| Length : | 1 semester | Teaching Language : | Danish if no English students are present |
| Objective : | Introduce students to basic Network Security issues. Achieve knowledge of current level of standardization. Work with practical Network Security implementations and security policy. Furthermore the course must give the participants the ability to independent research in the security area. | ||
| Principal Content : | Hacker methods Firewall IP security (IPSec) and other secure protocols Virtual Private Network (VPN) Design fundamentals Cryptography Intrusion Detection System (IDS) Viruses and trojan horse Security policy |
||
| Teaching method : | Class teaching, lab-exercises and course assignments. Approximately 75% of the time will be spent on lab-exercises and course assignments. |
||
| Required prequisites : | Documented knowledge similar to NET4/NETE (basic TCP/IP knowledge). | ||
| Recommended prerequisites : | - | ||
| Relations : | NETM and Linux | ||
| Type of examination : | Oral examination based on assignments | ||
| External examiner : | Internal | ||
| Marking : | Scale of 13 | ||
| Remarks : | The course assignments must be approved before the students can enter the examination At the examination each student is allocated 15 minutes. The examination is a group examination but the marking is individual. The evaluation is based on a general impression of the level achieved by the student relative to the objective of the course. The evaluation is based on the report, the oral performance and the functionality of the assignment. The group presents the assignment by giving well-prepared presentations The duration of the presentation is approx. 10 minutes per student. The group is required to coordinate the presentations in such a way that the major aspects of the assignment are covered, that the presentations are different and that each individual presentation has a good technical span. After the presentation the supervisor and the external examiner pose questions inspired by the presentations and the report. The questions are a priori individual but may - if found relevant by the supervisor or the external examiner - form the basis of a broader group discussion. During the evaluation by the supervisor and the external examiner, the project group leaves the room. Afterwards the group is summoned and the individual marks are explained. If the student does not pass the examination, the student is given guidance on how to improve the chances of passing. |
||
| Teaching material : | Stephen Northcutt, Lenny Zeltser, Scott Winters, Karen Kent Frederick & Ronald W. Ritchey: Network Perimeter Security, New Riders, ISBN: 0-73571-232-8 |
||
| Responsible teacher : | Lars Faczineck-Beckmann
, lfb@ihk.dk |
||